|
Larry Paque wrote: > We also have the option of simply expanding the subject matter of > code400-l. Are there any objections to that? I am a code400-l subscriber who does not use VARPG. It is OK with me if the list is expanded to cover VARPG as well as code400. -- -Jeff The opinions expressed are my own and not necessarily the opinion of my company. Unless I say so.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.