|
Phil, thanks for responding. > > Phil, the key to understanding this is to think of BIFs as nothing more > than IBM-supplied sub-procedures, which > indeed they are. They are simply IBM-supplied functions which the RPG > runtime executes as it encounters them. > Asking the debugger to show their return value is the same as asking it to > show the return value of your own > sub-procedures. I'm only talking about the file I/O bif's. That's all. Not %subst or any of that ilk. The program obviously knows what the result is! And so does the file feedback ds! Why can't the debugger use that same info? Wouldn't it be cool if we could add the infds (and the psds) to the debugger without it being coded in the program! Kind of like calling a program in verbose mode. :) Thanks again for your time, Phil _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.