|
Thanks, Reeve. I didn't think about CHGPF. I added the action to CPO under as/400 members (was only under as/400 objects.) This is not bad. But I'd really like to add CHGPF to the CODE Program Generator. I'm having trouble doing this. I've look in the documentation included with WDTS and have tried to add one a couple ways but with no luck. Is it possible to do this? Thanks, Phil > -----Original Message----- > From: code400-l-admin@midrange.com > [mailto:code400-l-admin@midrange.com]On Behalf Of Reeve Fritchman > Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 10:28 AM > To: code400-l@midrange.com > Subject: RE: replacing a PF > > > Is there a reason not to use CHGPF SRCFILE{}, or is this a > generic question > about the way PDM works? For CHGPF (ALTER TABLE), the creation > date doesn't > change but everything else does (assuming old and new column > attributes are > mapable). IMV, there is some wisdom in not allowing a casual > (in-line/automatic) deletion of a PF. > > Regards, > Reeve _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.