|
Is there a reason not to use CHGPF SRCFILE{}, or is this a generic question about the way PDM works? For CHGPF (ALTER TABLE), the creation date doesn't change but everything else does (assuming old and new column attributes are mapable). IMV, there is some wisdom in not allowing a casual (in-line/automatic) deletion of a PF. Regards, Reeve -----Original Message----- From: code400-l-admin@midrange.com [mailto:code400-l-admin@midrange.com]On Behalf Of Phil Groschwitz Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 1:26 PM To: CODE400-l@midrange.com Subject: replacing a PF Is there a way when creating a file (CRTPF) to be prompted whether to delete the existing object or not, the way SEU does? Thanks, Phil __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ _______________________________________________ This is the CODE/400 Discussion & Support (CODE400-L) mailing list To post a message email: CODE400-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/code400-l or email: CODE400-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/code400-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.