|
There was a lot of interactive "I believe that you may be mistaken..." Normally instigated by me. There were two other people there who admitted to using Code in the past. One was really disappointed that the source comparison was just given a mention and no visual. While we were waiting, the board asked if anyone had some real world experience and I jumped up and spoke off the cuff for about 1/2 hour. It was just winding down when he showed up into the room. Most of the attendees are repeats so I believe that we'll have enough good will to carry us through. Rob Berendt ================== "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin "David Schopp" <dschopp@imt.net> To: <code400-l@midrange.com> Sent by: cc: code400-l-admin@mi Fax to: drange.com Subject: RE: Poor Code presentation 11/14/2001 12:38 PM Please respond to code400-l I see a couple of terrible things happened here. 1. An hour late with no notification? Tsk, tsk. Respectability is in the toilet. 2. The organizer should have verified the speaker's qualifications and presentation. I would have thought that this would have identified problems or "red flags" beforehand. 3. What sort of follow up or rebuttal was done? Was it (as it sounds) audience members correcting/debating with the presentor? Was there a session director that could mediate the "damage" done by this guy? It sounds like you need a REAL expert or some "in the field" users present the REAL Code/400. This was a real shame to your user group members. I hope they don't see this as a reflection on the User Group and decide that it's not really worth their time. Sounds like "damage control" is needed now. Dave > -----Original Message----- > We had a gentleman speak at our user group meeting last night > about Code. > > 1) He showed up an hour late. Got lost and never took > advantage of the > cell phone and pager numbers given him. > > 2) Had so many errors in his presentation that were > destructive at best. > Like - did you know they dropped the Project Organizer in > V5R1? Could have > fooled me. I've not been using any release except V5R1 and I > see it there. > Found out he had trouble getting it working in V5R1 so he assumed they > dropped it. (The epitome of defining assume.) > a) He never ran the verifier - says he always compiles didn't know > anything about how it worked - like file definitions, etc. > > People started walking out like lemmings. Granted many of > them came from a > distance and wanted to get home. > _______________________________________________ This is the CODE/400 Discussion & Support (CODE400-L) mailing list To post a message email: CODE400-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/code400-l or email: CODE400-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/code400-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.