× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



I do know that Next Sentence is handled differently in ILE than OPM. In
ILE it goes to the next "." where before it would just jump out of that IF
statement. Continue is what is suppose to be used to just jump out of the
IF statement and not go to the next ".".

I had some issues with a Table being INDEXED and starting position of the
table in OPM and ILE worked differently maybe it was 0 in OPM and 1 in ILE,
not really for sure just remember I compiled a couple programs in ILE and
the program started to Abend when working with the table maybe someone else
will have better explanation?

EXIT PROGRAM have had issue with mix OPM ILE programs, the ILE program that
has EXIT PROGRAM could drop though the EXIT PROGRAM instead of going back
to calling program because of Activation group differences or differences
between ILE and OPM.

Have not compiled to many current OPM programs to ILE, these were just a
couple of things I remember dealing with so far.......And the ones I did
where stand alone batch programs that didn't have a lot of calls with other
programs etc....



Jeff Buening
Sr. Developer
P: 419.586.8599 | F: 419.586.6224

Celina Insurance Group
800.552.5181 | 1 Insurance Square, Celina, Ohio 45822
www.celinainsurance.com

...............................................................................................................


The information contained in this message (including any attachments) is
confidential and may be privileged.
Unauthorized disclosure, copying, or use of this information is prohibited
and may be unlawful.
If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and
notify the sender.



From: "Stone, Joel" <Joel.Stone@xxxxxxxxxx>

To: "'COBOL Programming on the iSeries/AS400'" <cobol400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,

Date: 10/15/2012 11:02 AM

Subject: [COBOL400-L] old OPM cobol: compile as ILE






We have some ancient OPM cobol that we want to expand table sizes beyond
OPM's limits. ILE limits will accommodate the table expansions.

Have you seen any issues when compiling OPM pgms as ILE?

Do they run just fine without any changes?

What areas should we watch for?

I have not seen issues in the past, but have not done this en masse before
either.

Thanks!



______________________________________________________________________
This outbound email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs
Skyscan service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________
--
This is the COBOL Programming on the iSeries/AS400 (COBOL400-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: COBOL400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/cobol400-l
or email: COBOL400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/cobol400-l.





As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.