|
Jon, I appreciate your response. Let me rephrase my issue/question. Perhaps the compiler option BLK/NOBLK has nothing to do with what I am wanting to know. We READ and WRITE quite a few sequential files (not indexed or relative) in many of our COBOL programs. Virtually all of the FD's for those files have the BLOCK CONTAINS clause specified. Many of these sequential files have variable length records. My question is what is the best combination to use in the iSeries world? 1) Remove the BLOCK CONTAINS altogether and let the compiler block and de-block as it sees fit? Does it do a good job? 2) Retain BLOCK CONTAINS and use what was originally specified in the VSE world? 3) Retain BLOCK CONTAINS and but specify a new value that is more correct for the iSeries world? Is there a rule of thumb for this?
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.