|
I believe that IBM is trying to make the Language Environment concept
standard on all platforms. Yes - but be careful in taking this thought too far. The compilers are not the same (i.e. no or little common code) and the behavior of generated code may be different in "fringe" behavior areas... ILE and LE don't really have the same roots - just similar names. ILE was originally known as NPM (New Program Model) but it was decided that the implication that the previous model was "Old" was politically incorrect (even if true). As a result a new name had to be found to replace NPM. ILE (Integrated Language Environment) was the final choice - partly because the system was implementing some of the LE APIs (mainly the CEE... Set). But that really is where the compatibility with LE ends. There have been changes to the ILE COBOL compiler to make it simpler for mainframers to convert (the COMPASBIN option being one) but most of the compatibility comes from meeting the ANSI standards not from matching the mainframe version. If anything there were more changes made in UI handling for compatibility with PC and Unix dialects from MicroFocus and AcuCOBOL than for mainframe. Jon Paris Partner400 www.Partner400.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.