|
If the function of the Assembler programs is related to system functions, check out using API processes identified with the OS. If the programs are processing business rule functions, the Object Oriented nature of ILE should allow for replacing the assembler programs. The answer really does depend on what the programs are trying to accomplish. Gregory A. Garner Garner Data Systems, Inc. 4270 Grand Teton Parkway Suwanee, GA 30024 Phone: 770 845 9636 Fax:770 614 3496 -----Original Message----- From: cobol400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cobol400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael Rosinger Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 10:42 AM To: cobol400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [COBOL400-L] COBOL/ILE questions Thanks Terry. That is a good resource. Here's another migration question for you (and anyone else that wants to chime in). What is the equivalent of Assembler on iSeries? Correct me if I am wrong, but it is my understanding that there is no Assembler on iSeries. We have several callable utility sub-routines that are written in Assembler. The reason Assembler is the best choice for these things on the mainframe is its efficiency and speed for things that are called many times by many programs. So if these routines have to be rewritten, what language would be best suited?
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
