Re: COBOL/ILE questions

Michael,

How about "It depends"?

ILE programs, if designed and created correctly, can be fast, with little
overhead on the call.

Does the utility program get called many times from the same programs,
before they end?  Do they get called once from a lot of different programs?


CL and COBOL, (and yes gasp RPG) all have ILE capabilities.  Some system
stuff I have done in ILE CL and application in ILE COBOL.  Jon Paris and
Susan Ganter are great resources for learning ILE.  They teach/have taught
classes about it.  You have already heard from Jon on this and the WDSC
list.

COMMON would also be a good education source to learn system i type things,
although COBOL is VERY light in sessions.  ILE concepts taught for RPG
apply, even though some of the examples have to be translated to COBOL.

HTH

On 8/23/06, Michael Rosinger <mrosinger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Thanks Terry. That is a good resource.

Here's another migration question for you (and anyone else that wants to
chime in).

What is the equivalent of Assembler on iSeries? Correct me if I am wrong,
but it is my understanding that there is no Assembler on iSeries. We have
several callable utility sub-routines that are written in Assembler. The
reason Assembler is the best choice for these things on the mainframe is
its
efficiency and speed for things that are called many times by many
programs.
So if these routines have to be rewritten, what language would be best
suited?

--
Regards,

Michael Rosinger
Systems Programmer / DBA
Computer Credit, Inc.
640 West Fourth Street
Winston-Salem, NC  27101
336-761-1524
m rosinger at cciws dot com
"Winchester Terry" <terry.winchester@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:mailman.667.1156336347.5750.cobol400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Here's a direct link:
>
> http://www.systeminetwork.com/resources/code/misccode/cobolcode/
>
> Terry Winchester
> Programmer/Analys