RE: External Clause

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
Hi Jon

Thanks for the reply. I checked the activation group. All there programs
are in same AG (QILE). But, program objects are in different libraries.
Could this cause a problem?

Thanks & Regards
Siva

-----Original Message-----
From: cobol400-l-admin@midrange.com
[mailto:cobol400-l-admin@midrange.com] On Behalf Of Jon Paris
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 4:26 AM
To: cobol400-l@midrange.com
Subject: RE: External Clause

 >> Can anybody throw light on this strange phenomenon? Are we missing
something here.

You must be - because what you are describing is impossible.  The
compiler's
processing of code from a COPY member and from within the source is
_identical_ - there is zero difference.

So, the answer has to be in the way that they are compiled or something.
Best guess would be that the programs all used the same AG originally
and
someone has now compiled one of them into a different AG and/or used
*CALLER
as the AG definition on one of the programs.

Jon Paris
Partner400

_______________________________________________
This is the COBOL Programming on the iSeries/AS400 (COBOL400-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: COBOL400-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/cobol400-l
or email: COBOL400-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/cobol400-l.

--
**************************Disclaimer**************************************************

 Information contained in this E-MAIL being proprietary to Wipro Limited is 
'privileged'
and 'confidential' and intended for use only by the individual or entity to 
which it is
addressed. You are notified that any use, copying or dissemination of the 
information
contained in the E-MAIL in any manner whatsoever is strictly prohibited.

****************************************************************************************