RE: Problems with Insert in Embedded SQL

[qsrvbas@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Tom Liotta)]

Jon:

I don't recall seeing much of a resolution for this, nor did I see any 
reference to the possible use of a level-66 RENAMES item. _MAYBE_ it'd work in 
some circumstances better than some of the alternatives... not necessarily in 
your circumstance, but maybe.

Tom Liotta

cobol400-l-request@midrange.com wrote:

> it won't work for
>structures - and it should.  Qualified individual fields is of no use - not
>when it means you've got to key in 50 odd definitions by hand with the
>possibility that you miss/mis-sequence one and the pre-compiler doesn't
>notice!!
>
>The use of host structures is significantly weakened if the dang things have
>to be uniquely named.

--
Tom Liotta
The PowerTech Group, Inc.
19426 68th Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032
Phone  253-872-7788
Fax    253-872-7904
http://www.powertechgroup.com



__________________________________________________________________
Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. Experience 
the convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape! 
http://shopnow.netscape.com/

Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at 
http://webmail.netscape.com/