|
Jon: I don't recall seeing much of a resolution for this, nor did I see any reference to the possible use of a level-66 RENAMES item. _MAYBE_ it'd work in some circumstances better than some of the alternatives... not necessarily in your circumstance, but maybe. Tom Liotta cobol400-l-request@midrange.com wrote: > it won't work for >structures - and it should. Qualified individual fields is of no use - not >when it means you've got to key in 50 odd definitions by hand with the >possibility that you miss/mis-sequence one and the pre-compiler doesn't >notice!! > >The use of host structures is significantly weakened if the dang things have >to be uniquely named. -- Tom Liotta The PowerTech Group, Inc. 19426 68th Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 Phone 253-872-7788 Fax 253-872-7904 http://www.powertechgroup.com __________________________________________________________________ Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape! http://shopnow.netscape.com/ Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
