RE: Converting from CICS (was no subject)

This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
I might have missed this up front, but why are you going native? Does the
400 you are going to not have CICS on it? I have used CICS on both although
I must admit the last mainframe version I used was 1.7 (no cracks about age
here please :-) ). The 400 is simply less messy (again from the prospective
of 1.7). Or are you trying to get BMS to DDS?

-----Original Message-----
From: dkhansen@fbwc.com [mailto:dkhansen@fbwc.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 12:30 PM
To: cobol400-l@midrange.com
Subject: RE: Converting from CICS (was no subject)




I appreciate your response.  I would agree with teaching us mainframers the
tricks of the 400.  I am sure there is a ton of stuff that we should be
looking
at.

We are at the front end of the conversion.  We are not exactly what
direction we
are going to be going.  We have looked at two 3rd party vendors that claim
they
can convert all of our COBOL CICS to native.  The one bid we got back was
extremely pricey however.  We are trying to decide if we can get some help
from
a vendor if we are going to have to do it ourselves, scary thought.  We are
not
aware of any tools other than vendors to help convert CICS to native.  Are
there
some out there?  We did look into CICS/400.  It was told to us that IBM does
not
support it anymore and has not done so for 4 years now.  It appears that
there
are only a very small handful who use it.  Is there more about CICS/400 that
we
are missing?

Again, Thanks so much for your help in our conversion.





"Jon Paris" <Jon.Paris@Partner400.com> on 12/23/2001 05:26:03 PM

Please respond to cobol400-l@midrange.com

To:   cobol400-l@midrange.com
cc:    (bcc: Dusty Hansen/UT/FBFS)

Subject:  RE: Converting from CICS (was no subject)



In general you do not need to worry about such things on the 400.  In fact
one of the hardest things I have found in trying to teach mainframers about
the 400 is that there a great many things you don't have to worry about!!
The 400s virtual storage system does a great job.  If you have a valid
reason for doing a transfer of control, it can be done - but the number of
times you need to do it are few and far between - and certainly not usually
for the kind of reason you mention.

How are you doing the conversion?  Are you using tools to convert the CIVS
to native or are you using CICS/400 ?

Jon Paris
Partner400




_______________________________________________
This is the COBOL Programming on the iSeries/AS400 (COBOL400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: COBOL400-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/cobol400-l
or email: COBOL400-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/cobol400-l.







_______________________________________________
This is the COBOL Programming on the iSeries/AS400 (COBOL400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: COBOL400-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/cobol400-l
or email: COBOL400-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/cobol400-l.