Re: Strange problem with an _Rreadk() -- C400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Strange problem with an _Rreadk()
From: "James H. H. Lampert" <jamesl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:59:45 -0800
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/c400-l>
List-help: <mailto:c400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: C programming iSeries / AS400 <c400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:c400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/c400-l>, <mailto:c400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/c400-l>, <mailto:c400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

CRPence wrote:

As alluded in my prior message(s)... Since apparently the failing code has a requirement to not share, in order to function properly, then even after "correction" to the file members to again have SHARE(*NO), an override with SHARE(*YES) can still break the file I\O processing.

Fortunately, the code in question *only* runs in a server job, that uses a proprietary protocol, and therefore has full control over all overrides.

--
JHHL

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.