Re: upgrade from V5R2 to V5R3. -- C400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: upgrade from V5R2 to V5R3.
From: Terrence Enger <tenger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 13:23:39 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/c400-l>
List-help: <mailto:c400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: C programming iSeries / AS400 <c400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:c400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/c400-l>, <mailto:c400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/c400-l>, <mailto:c400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

At 11:33 2007-04-16 -0400, Bob Crothers wrote:

I myself would never use (num=num) in a conditional statement.

Indeed, conditions of the form lvar=expr are so often an
accident that some compilers flag them at compile time. If
you *reallY* want to write that, you wrap the embedded
assignment in another set of parentheses.

Is there a way to tell C400 to flag such constructions?

Cheers,
Terry.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: upgrade from V5R2 to V5R3. , Elvis Budimlic

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.