Re: More loss of function in C compiler -- C400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: [C400-L] Re: More loss of function in C compiler
From: "Buck Calabro" <buck.calabro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 10:00:51 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/c400-l>
List-help: <mailto:c400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: C programming iSeries / AS400 <c400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:c400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/c400-l>, <mailto:c400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/c400-l>, <mailto:c400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

> Who else finds this attitude unacceptable?

I do.  It goes against everything the compiler teams have ever done in
the past.

> What can we do about it?

A DCR?  There's a link to the Design Change Request in the FAQ.

> This defect should be fixed instead of just being masked.

I agree.  I have enough trouble compiling stuff in C on iSeries
without having to fight the compiler/debugger more with the next
release.
  --buck

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.