× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Les Mittman - SBC wrote:

I am assuming that the Routers for both A1 and A2 are correctly defined as
Outside Operations and the Expected Standard Cost for the Item is entered on
the Routing.

Yes, the routers look identical except for the cost amount.

I would check the P.O. Detail Line for Item A1. For Outside Operation
P.O.'s, you must enter on the P.O. Line the S.O. Number and Operation Number
to which it applies. Then, when the A/P Invoice in entered and matched to
the P.O. Line, the just the Outside Operation Cost from the Routing
Operation will be used for the PPV calculation.

No hit here. Both HPO records have the SO and OpNo fields filled in. In fact, about the only difference other than what should be different, is a field named POFENO with a heading of Item Revision. The A2 parts have 01, while the A1 lines have 00.

Bill

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.