Re: BPCS-L Digest, Vol 6, Issue 33

Don,

The regen indicates that the end item now has a due date of 2008/03/29
which makes all the other dates valid except the Resche-Date- From MRP.

Did you run an MPS Generation prior to running the MRP Generation?

Best Regards,

Gerry Duhon, CPIM | Sr. Application Consultant | Professional Services
Infor | Cell:815.347.0754 |Gerry.Duhon@xxxxxxxxx


------------------------------

message: 2
date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 05:23:17 -0600
from: "Don Cavaiani" <dcavaiani@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
subject: [BPCS-L] KFP file Question

I changed the due date and firmed up a forecast, then did the regens.

I am looking at the dates on the End-Item vs the dates on one of the
sub-assemblies, and the system seems to have reversed the reschedule
dates??

Example:

Part Number Planned-Release-Date Planned-Due-Date
Resched-Date-From-MRP

sub-assy 2008/02/20 2008/02/24
2008/03/24
end-item 2008/03/25 2008/03/29
2008/02/29

Above is how the system looks after the regens.

Seems to be incorrect on the sub-assy part, or on the end-item - one of
them seems backwards to me??

Don F. Cavaiani
IT Manager
Amerequip Corp.
920-894-7063

"It's amazing what you can accomplish if you don't care who gets the
credit." Harry S. Truman





------------------------------

message: 3
date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 07:56:41 -0500
from: "Dan Sweeney" <dsweeney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: [BPCS-L] KFP file Question

Don,

Can you supply some more information?

Such as:

1. Quantity on-hand of the sub-assy and end-item.
2. Lead times of both items.


-----Original Message-----
From: bpcs-l-bounces+dsweeney=phoenixbcinc.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bpcs-l-bounces+dsweeney=phoenixbcinc.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of
Don Cavaiani
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 6:23 AM
To: bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [BPCS-L] KFP file Question

I changed the due date and firmed up a forecast, then did the regens.

I am looking at the dates on the End-Item vs the dates on one of the
sub-assemblies, and the system seems to have reversed the reschedule
dates??

Example:

Part Number Planned-Release-Date Planned-Due-Date
Resched-Date-From-MRP

sub-assy 2008/02/20 2008/02/24
2008/03/24
end-item 2008/03/25 2008/03/29
2008/02/29

Above is how the system looks after the regens.

Seems to be incorrect on the sub-assy part, or on the end-item - one of
them
seems backwards to me??

Don F. Cavaiani
IT Manager
Amerequip Corp.
920-894-7063

"It's amazing what you can accomplish if you don't care who gets the
credit." Harry S. Truman