|
As I understand the process, before printing on checks whose check #s are pre-printed on the check stock, our accounting lady tells BPCS what check # range will be used to pay what vendors, then if everything works perfectly, the data on the printed checks agrees with the data in BPCS. But sometimes she has a printing problem, leading to the check #s that got printed on, being say a few digits after what BPCS thinks they are. Apparently how she has been dealing with this is to scribble on the BPCS print-outs what check #s end up as, with the data in BPCS never being corrected. This way of handling things was apparently acceptable until a change in management, and the need to send copies of some of our BPCS data to another system that would appreciate getting correct data. How do other companies deal with this scenario? Do you void the whole run & start over? Does BPCS support start over, without a big hassle? Is there some program option we have overlooked where we can tell BPCS ... all the checks from 45321 onwards dated today need to be incremented by 2. If I have to go in there with DFU and muck with the check #s, is there a list of files affected? We are on 405 CD. - Al Macintyre http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:AlMac http://www.ryze.com/go/Al9Mac BPCS/400 Computer Janitor ... see http://radio.weblogs.com/0107846/stories/2002/11/08/bpcsDocSources.html
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.