|
Hi Everyone - Genyphyr is correct in that the most likely issue with such a long runtime is database I/O. There are many solutions to this type of problem but it would require more analysis to identify all of the files involved, the number of logical files, the order of the data, the access pattern of the application, etc. Centerfield has a long history with helping BPCS customers tune the application to the environment and to the way the database is used. We could certainly help with you with this. All my best, Jen ______________________________________________________ Jenniefer Halverson | Director System i Client-Partners 507.287.8119 EX 101 jhalverson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Centerfield Technology Rochester, Minnesota USA 55901 http://www.centerfieldtechnology.com -----Original Message----- From: bpcs-l-bounces+jen=centerfieldtechnology.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bpcs-l-bounces+jen=centerfieldtechnology.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Genyphyr Novak Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 10:39 AM To: bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [BPCS-L] ACR900 - too long Hello, If you are on BPCS CD, the suggestion mentioned below by Davide is irrelevant, as there is no SQL in that release of BPCS (unless you put some in yourselves), it only works SQL releases. Have you checked for duplicate records in all the affected files? Sometimes if these are present it will cause jobs to run a lot longer and have abnormally high I/O counts on the affected or related files. I suppose if you had SSA support you would have already called this in to the support center for analysis? So, if you do not have support and you do not have duplicate records, you can always try using the AS/400 performance tools to analyze the program to find the bottle neck, do some analysis and try to change the code to suit yourselves. Or hire an SSA consultant to come out to analyze the program for you to improve it. Thanks, Genyphyr Novak Senior System Software Engineer SSA Global R&D -----Original Message----- From: bpcs-l-bounces+genyphyr.novak=ssaglobal.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bpcs-l-bounces+genyphyr.novak=ssaglobal.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of bpcs-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: 18 March 2006 19:00 To: bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: BPCS-L Digest, Vol 4, Issue 65 Send BPCS-L mailing list submissions to bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to bpcs-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx You can reach the person managing the list at bpcs-l-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of BPCS-L digest..." *** NOTE: When replying to this digest message, PLEASE remove all text unrelated to your reply and change the subject line so it is meaningful. Today's Topics: 1. Re: ACR900 - too long (Davide Roveda) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- message: 1 date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 17:22:13 +0100 from: "Davide Roveda" <Davide.Roveda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> subject: Re: [BPCS-L] ACR900 - too long Hello The way to make a real check of SQL performance is: Let Iseries do for you: In this way:
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.