|
There should have been no issues with running depreciation anytime during the month of January but prior to closing in January. I would definitely recommend more research on the matter of the Last Year Depreciation Dollar Value. If BPCS calculated depreciation for 2004, that value should have moved to the Last Year Depreciation field. I would suggest they verify that the Current Year Depreciation field is $0.00 after running year-end. I would also validate that there should have been depreciation for the particular assets that have $0.00 in the Last Year Depreciation field. I would also recommend that you run a query on the Last Year Depreciation field and that value should also agree with the value posting into the G/L. I would also recommend that you run a query on the Current Year Depreciation field and validate that the value is $0.00 prior to running the month-end closing in January. Everything may be OK, but I would spend some more time researching to be absolutely sure. Hope this is helpful. Dan Sweeney Senior Technical Consultant PHOENIX Business Consulting, Inc. Tel: 724.836.4446 x7, Cell: 860.490.6712, E-Fax: 832-550-5144 www.phoenixbcinc.com SSA GLOBAL Recognized Services Provider -----Original Message----- From: bpcs-l-bounces+dsweeney=phoenixbcinc.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bpcs-l-bounces+dsweeney=phoenixbcinc.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of daparnin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 11:02 AM To: bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [BPCS-L] Last Year Depreciation I've got a fixed asset question. Our fixed asset person closed December at the end of the year but didn't run the year-end close until today. She said that it is her understanding that this is OK as long as the year-end close is done before the January close. After the year-end close she has found that some assets are showing zero for the total last year depreciation while others do have a value. The good news is that the total accumulated depreciation is correct for assets both with and without a total last year depreciation. Because this is correct they aren't too worried. Should we be? We are on version 4.02. Dave Parnin -- Nishikawa Standard Company Topeka, IN 46571 daparnin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.