|
What a truly stunning and Orwellian policy. The reason I asked is that I personally didn't think that there was any violation and had wondered what I missed. I'd be willing to bet real money that most of the list would agree. Can anyone conceive what it is that could be construed (in some wild flight of fancy) as being a violation?
I don't think AOL really cares what the violation is.
david
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.