BPCS License Key --- LOCKSMITH for BPCS

Locksmith for BPCS was invented to help companies that 
are stuck between: 

  >> a rock (need more machine resources)
  >> and a hard place (the new key price charged by SSA).

With Locksmith archiving, you can get the response time
improvement or storage space reduction you are looking for
without purging the data. The archived records retain all
the intricate links between BPCS files. That enables a Sarbanes-
Oxley auditor to look at those records again as if they had never
been removed from your production library.

You can get a free demo copy of Locksmith, so, before you place
an order with IBM, please consider this strategy ---->>

        +  Measure the response time improvement
             achievable with Locksmith software

The response time improvement realized from Locksmith (tm)
could be significant enough to postpone the day when a machine
upgrade is needed. That happy result would pay for a copy of
Locksmith many, many times over.

Details available here:
    http://www.unbeatenpathintl.com/locksmith_bpcs.htm 

More clever & affordable Sarbanes-Oxley compliance ideas:
   http://www.unbeatenpathintl.com/compliancecatalog/source/1.html 

Peace to you,
Milt Habeck
Unbeaten Path International

North America:  (888) 874-8008
International line: (262) 681-3151
mhabeck@xxxxxxxxxx 
www.unpath.com 




++++++   ++++++   ++++++   ++++++   ++++++   ++++++
From: DHolv@xxxxxxx
To: bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 8:05 PM
Subject: Re: BPCS License Key / also V5R3 II13889

Jim:

What this really means is that you won't be able to do much, unless you are
willing to part with some $$$$$.  My company went down this road, and it is
not
pretty.  Maybe some additional memory and disk for your existing unit?

Dan Holverson
Director of IT
Bairnco Corporation





++++++   ++++++   ++++++   ++++++   ++++++   ++++++
From: Reinardy, James
To: SSA's BPCS ERP System
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 8:06 AM
Subject: RE: BPCS License Key / also V5R3 II13889

Dan,

I am coming to that conclusion, too.  We are looking at a larger
interactive card, more memory and disk and will likely stay with that
until there is a business reason to go back on OGS or switch to a
different software package.

Thanks to all for the replies, you have likely saved me a great deal of
pain and/or cash.

Regards,
Jim Reinardy