|
"Ardi Batmanghelidj" <ardibatman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Al, >> Based on your comments, it is clear that I have done an inadequate job of >> bringing our product to the attention of this group. In large part it has >> been out of respect for the members, and the belief that we should keep >> overt marketing to a minimum. I think I speak for all when I say I appreciate the sentiment expressed here. Two extremes have been demonstrated in this discussion. Mr. Batmanghelidj has been talking around what his company is selling, while Mr. Habeck and Mr. MacAlister have been shouting from the rooftops about what Mr. Habeck's company is selling. I think a middle ground is appropriate. There is no reason that a vendor can't reply to a question with some specific reference to a product, particularly when accompanied by substantive response to the issue. However, 8 posts and 50-60 URL references is overkill. Milt, you lost me in the middle of #2, and I was just irritated by the time #5 came in. I use the RSS feed; I can't imaging what the people actually getting emails must have been thinking. Obviously, others (including possibly our esteemed moderator) will have different opinions. Regards all! Tom Jedrzejewicz
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.