|
Good evening ... If you have ever tried to quickly identify critical planning issues by flipping through a thousand page BPCS MRP/MPS report, you'll love Unbeaten Path's "PaperSaver" Exception Report. PaperSaver provides users with true exception reporting for the BPCS master production scheduling and material requirements planning systems. More info about this Bells & Whistles® for BPCS software product is available here: http://www.unbeatenpathintl.com/bellspaper.html God bless, Milt Habeck President Unbeaten Path International North American toll free: (888) 874-8008 International voice line: (262) 681-3151 mhabeck@xxxxxxxxxx www.unbeatenpathintl.com ----- Original Message ----- From: Martin Foglesong To: bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 3:30 PM Subject: MRP Planned Order Due Date The short answer to the specific problem is you have released the item that placed the requirement on the child item. By doing this you have indicated to MRP it must get the child created ASAP. The earliest it can be created is the date the Parent is due since the requirement is now "past due" from a lead-time perspective. I would be surprised if you didn't see the child on an MRP exception report indicating an "Expedite" condition. Martin Foglesong Senior Technology Consultant Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:54:34 -0600 from: "Judi Svoboda" <Judis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> subject: MRP RELEASE DATE FOR SMALL PARTS Before and After Release of Parent Hi to All Using BPCS 405CD. Have a question concerning MRP due date of child part planned order before parent planned order is released and MRP due date of child part planned order after parent order is released. Child part planned order has due date of one day before parent, when parent is a planned order. If the parent gets released before the child part is released, after MRP has run the child part planned order part due date changes to the start date of parent Why does the due date for the child change to one day later after the parent is released? The start date for the parent is the same when the parent is a planned order and when it is a released order. But, now instead of the due date for child part planned order being day before the parent start date, the due date of child part planned order is day of parent start date. Why does the due date for the child part say the day before the start date of the parent before the release of the parent order and day of the start date of parent after the release of the parent order? Would appreciate any help. Judi Svoboda, Ridewell Corp
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.