× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Thank you very much for your responses so far.  

We are set up similar to Al, where we run MRP nightly and don't use order
policy K...  

Robert, we have a mix of both stock items and made to order; but I don't
think the made to order items will stop us from using the prorated forecast
- we are trying to enforce having our sales employees enter customer orders
for those items, which would then drive requirements.  If we do end up
forecasting them, we'll make the start and end dates the same...  I couldn't
agree more on it being an issue of training and all.

I've set up our test environment to run a prorated forecast.  In a nutshell,
requirements appear prorated, but orders don't (most apparent on MRP300
screen --Planning/Pegging Inquiry).  The main reason we are forecasting is
to have more reliable MRP results; our next step is to start using PUR640 PO
Consolidation/Release - our goal is to automate creating and distributing
POs based on MRP... I'm going to do some further testing - thinking I might
have a parameter set up wrong, else this prorate flag is useless to us.

DeeDee Virgei
Project Leader
Nelson Stud Welding, Inc.
7900 West Ridge Rd
Elyria, OH 44036

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Robert Hendrick [mailto:rhendrick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent:   Monday, August 25, 2003 8:01 AM
To:     'bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject:        RE: BPCS-L Digest, Vol 1, Issue 745

We have prorated the sales forecasts for years. It does cause quite a bit of
confusion with certain functions, but so would not prorating the forecasts.
It is an issue of  training  and getting the proper departments to
understand what they are looking at. It also works best for made to stock
items. If your product line is make to order, it is probably not a good
idea.

 
Robert Hendrick


-----Original Message-----
From: bpcs-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bpcs-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2003 1:00 PM
To: bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: BPCS-L Digest, Vol 1, Issue 745


Send BPCS-L mailing list submissions to
        bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        bpcs-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx

You can reach the person managing the list at
        bpcs-l-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of BPCS-L digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Anyone entering BPCS Forecast have the Prorate Forecast flag
      set       on? (DeeDee Virgei)
   2. Re: SSA Interview (Bill)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

message: 1
date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 17:23:24 -0400
from: DeeDee Virgei <DeeDee.Virgei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
subject: Anyone entering BPCS Forecast have the Prorate Forecast flag
        set     on?

Hi All,

Just curious if any of you have the system parameter "Prorate Forecasts?"
set to Y.  We did a long time ago (in Oct. 1996, set it from Y to N  I think
mostly due to confusion -- caused w/ the sales staff).  Anyways I have a
request to turn this flag back on.  Also, we use demand code 1 "Greater of
Forecasts and Customer Orders".  Any comments appreciated.  Thanks in
advance :-). 

Oh yeah, we are on 4.05 CD.

DeeDee Virgei
Project Leader
Nelson Stud Welding, Inc.
7900 West Ridge Rd
Elyria, OH 44036


------------------------------

message: 2
date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 07:53:54 -0700
from: "Bill" <billzbubb@xxxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: SSA Interview


Al Mac wrote:
> Some of what is being said does not seem to jive with some things a 
> lot of people bitching about on this list in recent months ... it is
> prohibitively
> expensive to upgrade your AS/400 if you are no longer on their tech
> support.

Can you point to the article which addresses this point?  Believe me, what
people are "bitching" about is not a fabrication, it is a fact.

Bill



------------------------------

_______________________________________________
This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) digest list
To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.



End of BPCS-L Digest, Vol 1, Issue 745
**************************************
_______________________________________________
This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.