×

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.




This is in fact what the APAR tells you to do.
Initially, IBM provided this support for older versions of BPCS at v5r1
OS/400 and said that this would not be provided at V5R2, however I can tell
you that it is provided, and that V5R2 is fine with these versions of BPCS.
As Genyphyr points out, newer BPCS releases do not need it.

Clare

----- Original Message -----
From: "Francesc Junyent" <francescjm@xxxxxxxx>
To: <bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2003 11:45 AM
Subject: RE: BPCS 5.1 Issues upgrading to OS/400 V5R1


>
> My wife works in BPCS V5.01. When they upgraded to OS/400 V5R1, of course,
they had the well-known problems whith SQLRPG programs.
>
> The problems, you can remember, were originated because before V5R1, after
the get SQL operation FETCH the return code was 100 if the reading does not
succeed or 0 if it succeed. However in V5R1 a new return code has been
added. It is 30 when the reading has been done but with a litle trouble as,
for instance, different lengh fields. The most of programs are build as (in
pseudo code) :
>
>
>     IF Return code is not equal 0 then finish the loop.
>
> Therefore if the return code is 30 (reading has been done), the loop
finishes.
>
>
> My wife solved this trouble doing these two steps:
>
>
>     She copied the QAQQINI file from QSYS library to QSYSUSR.
>
>
>     She inserted a new record to the copied file using INSET SQL sentence
with these field values.
>
>
>             QQPARM => SQL_SUPPRESS_WARNINGS
>
>             QQVAL  => *YES
>
>
> That new record ovoids the new return code 30
>
>
> This is only a temporary solution, because I think in 2 or three years,
the QAQQINI new record will not work
>
>
> Francesc Junyent.
>
>
> Barcelona
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Original message:
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> APAR II12963 tells us that the SQL problems were confined to BPCS V6
>
> and
>
> above.
>
>
>
> Does the group agree?
>
>
>
> Are there any other caveats we should be aware of?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> John G. Dyer, CDP
>
> Vice President
>
> Information Management Consultants, Inc.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Messenger
> Nueva versi&oacute;n: Super Webcam, voz, caritas animadas, y m&aacute;s
#161;Gratis!
> _______________________________________________
> This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
> or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.
>
>


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.