|
One implication can be that SSA GT will concentrate less on BPCS R&D!! Not sure but I think its quite possible. Looking at the shift in focus of SSA GT and especially after reading the interview of GT's top man, the above statment seems quite probable. I think SSA GT now has too many babies to look after! >From: MacWheel99@aol.com >Reply-To: bpcs-l@midrange.com >To: bpcs-l@midrange.com >Subject: Re: "interBiz" acquisition by SSAGT >Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 13:49:49 EDT > >THANKS for this HUGE news, I am not sure this is the right forum to discuss >the implications, but I do not know what forum that should be. > > > http://www.interbiz.com/Press/Releases.asp?361 > >My initial thoughts on this include: > >CA & SSAX have been strong competitors in which I always had thought that >CA >was the larger conglomerate. I never had a good feel for the relative size >of GT. > >Does this mean that SSAGT now owns CA-PRMS? >Will SSAGT continue or improve support for CA-PRMS? >Did the US Justice Department approve this consolidation in the ERP >industry? > >Possible starting points where to go to review the relative sizes of the >market shares of the different ERP mentioned by this news release, as >opposed >to the rest of the ERP market in midsized manufacturing. >http://www.MidrangeEnterprise.com >http://www.apics.org >http://www.Enterprise.CNET.COM > >I had thought MANMAN was ERP for Unix including HP e3000 which HP is in >process of dumping. HP 3000 customers love that system as much as AS/400 is >loved, and now have an Open OS effort http://www.openMPE.org to salvage >what >HP is throwing away. Is there room for traditional commercial software >vendors to participate & compete in the Open Source universe? > >SSAX enters into a lot of partnerships with outfits that will value added >hand shake with BPCS but this is the first time since long before the >bankrupsy that I have been aware of such an aquisition. Some of the past >partnerships have been e-commerce & collaboration supply chain linked to >BPCS, which I think have great potential for future profits that perhaps >SSAX >wants to get more centrally involved in grabbing. > >I am not up on the latest BPCS versions but overall it seems to me that >SSAX >is extremely powerful in the area of core manufacturing, and a bit weak in >several industry nitches such as those that need serious re-engineering, >and >weak in several application areas that connect to core manufacturing, such >as >payroll, HR, financials. This aquisition is aimed squarely at repairing >weaknesses that SSAX is aware of. > >MacWheel99@aol.com (Alister Wm Macintyre) (Al Mac) >_______________________________________________ >This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list >To post a message email: BPCS-L@midrange.com >To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, >visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/bpcs-l >or email: BPCS-L-request@midrange.com >Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives >at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l. > _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.