A consultant who has a question and does not first seek an answer from knowledgeable sources before spending billable time researching the question is doing the customer a disservice. I understand theoretically the difference between these fields. What I can't explain is why ILQTY*ILNET does not equal ILQINS*ILNETS if there have been no unit of measure or conversion factor changes and no discounts have been taken. In addition, I can't explain why in some cases ILREV does not equal either of the two previous products. My assumption is there has been some type of user error, e.g. session failure without notifying IT, or a program bug. Charles L.Massoglia, President Massoglia Technical Consulting, Inc. firstname.lastname@example.org In MI 517-676-9700 or in NC 919-363-9395 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lacelle, Marc" <LACELLE@rcmint.ca> To: <BPCS-L@midrange.com> Sent: Tuesday, 03 April, 2001 08:44 Subject: RE: ILQTY vs ILQINS vs ILREV In SIL > Hi Ho. > > Aren't consultants suppose to know this stuff. That's why we hire > you. Right????? > > > > > > ---------- > > From: Charlie Massoglia[SMTP:email@example.com] > > Reply To: BPCS-L@midrange.com > > Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 6:25 PM > > To: BPCS-L@midrange.com > > Subject: ILQTY vs ILQINS vs ILREV In SIL > > > > What is the difference between ILQTY and ILQINS in SIL? Also what is the > > difference between ILNET and ILNETS in SIL? My understanding is ILQTY > > and ILNET are stocking unit of measure and price while ILNET and ILNETS > > are selling unit of measure and price. Why would these fields be > > different if the stocking and selling unit of measure are the same? And > > why would ILNETS be zero? Also, where does the field ILREV fit into the > > equation? > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > Charles L.Massoglia, President > > Massoglia Technical Consulting, Inc. > > firstname.lastname@example.org > > In MI 517-676-9700 or in NC 919-363-9395 > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > The Royal Canadian Mint is proud to be among the "35 Best Companies to Work > For in Canada" in 2001, according to the Globe and Mail's Report On Business > Magazine. > > La Monnaie royale canadienne est fière de se retrouver, pour l'an 2001, > parmi les «35 meilleures entreprises où travailler au Canada», selon la > revue Report On Business du Globe and Mail. > > +--- > | This is the BPCS Users Mailing List! > | To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com. > | To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com. > | To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. > | Questions should be directed to the list owner: email@example.com > +--- > +--- | This is the BPCS Users Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner: firstname.lastname@example.org +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.