Re: Seperate Libraries

[DAsmussen@xxxxxxx]

Nmenon,

In a message dated 9/13/00 9:25:42 AM Eastern Daylight Time, nmenon@cott.com 
writes:

> Is there any other reason for creating seperate libraries for Base BPCS, 
PTF 
>  BPCS and BMR BPCS   in Production Environment, besides testing.

Yes.  If you load a bad PTF or new BMR, you could incapacitate your system 
and require a fresh reload of BPCS.  Everyone remember where your base 
install tapes are?  Or BPCSPTF?  Are those tapes still good (and how would 
you know without trying to reload)?  With the BMR library, you can rip out 
bad code without shutting down for hours...

JMHO,

Dean Asmussen
Enterprise Systems Consulting, Inc.
Fuquay-Varina, NC  USA
E-mail:  DAsmussen@aol.com

"The greatest joy in life is doing what others say you cannot do." -- Walter 
Bagehot
+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---