RE: Seperate Libraries

["Graziano, Marie" <mgraziano@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

This is a very organized way to do things.  As in any software you do not
touch the base.  The PTF is when they have modified the base and then BMRS
give you an audit of what was fixed.  When you are in production you should
have the library list setup 
                MYCOMPANY changes library's
                BPCSPTF
                BPCSO
                BPCSF
All that this does it structure your environment to know what is BPCS what
is yours and what is fixes.
Marie Graziano

 -----Original Message-----
From:   nmenon@cott.com [mailto:nmenon@cott.com] 
Sent:   Wednesday, September 13, 2000 8:17 AM
To:     BPCS-L@Midrange.com
Subject:        Seperate Libraries

Is there any other reason for creating seperate libraries for Base BPCS, PTF

BPCS and BMR BPCS   in Production Environment, besides testing.

Nmenon



_______________________________________________________________

Cott - The Leader in Premium Retailer Brand Beverage Innovation. 
_______________________________________________________________
+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---
+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---