|
midrange.com
You're right it came from the PO Number entered in order entry, then
populated TCOM when we shipped the order in ORD570. Our B transactions are
the result of ORD570 not INV500, but the result is the PO Number is in TCOM.
I am still grasping at straws here, but is it possible we have some
parameters set wrong or the program is timing out with only the ILI being
posted and not the IWI???
Our operators are supposed to post in batch... by posting interactive could
that cause the posting to abort before posting to IWI/IIM? Could some other
process interfere with a interactive job but not effect a batch job?
Does someone with more of a techie background know the answer?
Thanks,
Kent
----------
From: Odonnell John CF CH[SMTP:john.odonnell@cibasc.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2000 2:25 AM
To: 'BPCS-L@midrange.com'
Subject: RE: IWI and ILI Imbalances
The TCOM field for the B transaction is populated in INV500, the
user can
enter whatever he likes in the comment field and this feeds through
to the
TCOM field in ITH. You can change the comment description in the
ITE so
that when the user enters INV500 he may be asked for a "PO Number"
but
essentially it is a free field.
Rgards
John O'Donnell
-----Original Message-----
From: klvanhorn@lozier.com [mailto:klvanhorn@lozier.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2000 5:37 PM
To: BPCS-L@midrange.com
Subject: RE: IWI and ILI Imbalances
HP/Oracle 6.0.04
We had a similar situation:
We had 2 items on the same day that had no ILI or IWI records.
PR transaction for 4 and 1 respectively
B transaction for 4- and 1- respectively
In both cases the ILI updated correctly but the B transactions did
not
update IWI.
Both B transactions had a Transaction Comment in ITH (TCOM) of
"VC-5". This
has no meaning anywhere in our system. SSA helpline checked with
the
programmers and it has no meaning to them. I queried ITH and this
does not
appear anywhere else. This field is populated by BPCS.
Does this mean anything to anyone?
Dick do you have anything in this field?
Kent Van Horn
lkvanhorn@huntel.net
----------
From: Bailey, Dick[SMTP:Dick_Bailey@MCFA.COM]
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2000 3:28 PM
To: 'BPCS-L@midrange.com'
Subject: RE: IWI and ILI Imbalances
What we have sounds different - the resulting
inventory
balance is
correct in either ILI or IWI but not both. Here are two
specific
examples:
#1 - Item G3KFC/3404770, for which no ILI or IWI
record
existed on
6/1, we had:
PR transaction for a quantity of 1 on 6/13.
Result was Receipts of 1 in both the IWI and ILI
records,
and a
total of -1 Adjustments in the IWI record.
No other transactions prior to this one. ILI shows
one on
hand, IWI
shows zero.
#2 - Item 9542703010, for which on 6/1 there were no
ILI
records,
and an IWI record containing zero opening balance, zero
adjustments,
zero
receipts and zero issues.
On 6/22 we had a B transaction for 2 and a =
transaction for
2 (We
shipped this kit) - and ended up with an ILI record
containing
Issues of 2
and Receipts of 2. The IWI record, however, had Receipts of
3 and
Issues of
2. So ILI showed zero on hand but IWI showed -1.
No previous transactions since 3/22.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Lacelle, Marc
[mailto:LACELLE@rcmint.ca]
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2000 8:32 AM
To: 'BPCS-L@midrange.com'
Subject: RE: IWI and ILI Imbalances
Hi Ho.
How about that INV971D. Kidding.
We are also experiencing the same
problems.
SSA
cannot duplicate the
problem and this leaves us to fix the
problem
ourselves. SSA
when trying to
duplicate the problem probably only generate
10
transactions. We on the
other hand generate about 50,000
transactions of
which 10 or
so items are
affected.
We to have noticed the B and T
transactions
are
giving false
information. For those who are wondering
what we are
talking
about. This is
the situation.
In your INV300 you will notice a MTD
and a
YTD
column. These columns
are the sum of Issues - Receipts -
Adjustments -
Sales for
the month and
year.
The B and T transactions:
The "B" transaction will
affect the
Issue
and Sales
The "T" transaction will
affect the
Adjustment
For some unknown reason the
quantities are
being
posted in the wrong
place.
Example: A "B" transaction
for 20
will post
against the
ADJUSTMENT and SALES. Remember the "B"
should affect
the
ISSUE and the
SALES.
What those this do to my inventory
Marc, you
ask?
Nothing. Your
inventory is adjusted properly, since the
calculation is
(Opening + Receipts
- Issues - or + Adjustments). Even though
the
transaction
was posted
incorrectly as an adjustment the calculation
for
your on
hand is correct.
I have written a program that fixes
the
problem for
YTD. Since your
MTD at the end of each month goes to 0, I
never
bothered to
write on that
fixes the MTD.
Hopefully Dick, someone else will
notice
this and we
could make a
case to SSA. Let's keep in touch on this
one.
Marc Lacelle
Royal Canadian Mint
> ----------
> From: Bailey,
Dick[SMTP:Dick_Bailey@MCFA.COM]
> Reply To: BPCS-L@midrange.com
> Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2000 11:36
AM
> To: 'BPCS-L@midrange.com'
> Subject: IWI and ILI Imbalances
>
>
>
> Here I am again, trying to maintain
some
faith that
BPCS on hand
> balance programs work - We keep getting
out-of-balance
conditions between
> IWI and ILI MTD adjustment balances during
the
month, with
no apparent
> pattern. In this case the IWI record
always is
incorrect.
It is not a new
> IWI record, and is not related to a
transaction in
which a
new ILI record
> is
> created.
>
> The transactions involved include B
and T so
far.
>
> Anybody have a clue what we have to
fix??
(And
please don't tell
> me to run a program to re-synch the
records; we
know how
to do that.)
>
> Dick Bailey
> MCFA
> +---
> | This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail
to
BPCS-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to
BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email
to
BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list
owner:
dasmussen@aol.com
> +---
>
+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to
BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to
BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email
to
BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list
owner:
dasmussen@aol.com
+---
+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to
BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to
BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to
BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner:
dasmussen@aol.com
+---
+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to
BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---
+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to
BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---
+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
