Re: Asset V6.1.00 with BPCS 6.0.02 or BPCS6.0.04

["Genyphyr Novak" <novakg@xxxxxxxx>]

Hello Walt,

This is not done or tested at SSA; we are using 6.0.04 ADK internally to
compile 6.0.02 BPCS BMRs. If you did end up having any problems, this would
not be supported by R&D BMRs to 6.1.00 ADK - it would be recommended that
you instead use 6.0.04 ADK, since that is known to work properly with your
release of BPCS. Version 6.1.00 ADK was designed around eBPCS.

Thanks

Genyphyr Novak
SSA


-----Original Message-----
From: Schaff,Walter <walt.schaff@abbott.com>
To: BPCS-L@midrange.com <BPCS-L@midrange.com>
Date: Wednesday, February 02, 2000 1:08 PM
Subject: Asset V6.1.00 with BPCS 6.0.02 or BPCS6.0.04


>We're looking to upgrade Asset to V6.1.00 and wonder if there are any known
>problems with using Asset V6.1.00 with BPCS V6.0.02 action diagrams.  I
tend
>to recall some previous posting about this.
>+---
>| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
>| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
>| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
>| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
>| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
>+---
>

+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---