Re: V43 and BPCS Performance -- BPCS-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



We did the same upgrade on Sept 6 and starting having the same problems
with BPCS 6.0.2.  The problems we had were with the embedded SQL
statements.  IBM has resolved our problem with the database package PTF
SF99103 dated 10/11/99 or later.

We also had 1 query (out of a thousand) that would not execute via runqry,
but would work within wrkqry.  For product# 5769SS1, PTF's   SF59048,
SF59049,  SF59222, SF59225 corrected that problem.

Ron Hudson
Ron.Hudson@colaik.com
Collins & Aikman




We had our system upgraded from V4R1 to V4R3 during the weekend. Since then
we
found performance of the   BPCS applications
degraded. Can anyone tell me whether there were any performace PTF's for
BPCS .

Thanks in advance

Gehan Jayasundera
Hella Australia



+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.