Re: [28-year] Y2K tools for BP CS 5.1

My Apologies  to all  for  posting this note in full.  I  did not  see
BPCS-L  trucked in the reply to all list.  It was meant to be  a private
reply  to the  originator and list moderator on  a proposed posting....with
 views on its'  value to the MIS  people  on this list.  I  take  no
position and offer only an opinions for   their considerations.
                        Glenn
Dear Milt &  Dean
 With all due  respects  to  all parties.
 FWIW I think  this is not a matter  for our MIS Community. 
It  is more for the Legal  experts to decide.

The  very fact this has made its' way into the European and US Court
systems suggests both parties believe they are correct.

I  consider myself   knowledgable on Y2K and  many of the  tools.  However
based on the information available it  is difficult  to draw any
conclusions.  There  could also be  several regional Y2K firms  that  use
the TOCS  philosophy in their implementations/solutions, who might be in
violation or  running  on a  similar or  almost parallel  path but not
violating the patient.

NOT  being  the legal  expert -  as  is the  case for most  MIS people on
the list we can not say. 
 From a  layman's  view, one might think , this posting might tend to
change or taint the court casein the Judges eyes. Again I  am  not  a
lawyer  nor is this legal advice.

You  & Dean have to decide what is  the  right process to follow here.

        Regards,  Glenn.

At 10:03 AM 9/16/99 -0500, Milt H. wrote: 

+++SNIP+++
+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---