|
Greetings BPCS Manufacturing/SFC Gurus, Its Monday morning and you undoubtedly need something to jump start your week. This is my first submission to the list and I am a Business Analyst, not a RPG programmer, so write slowly! We are running BPCS 4.0 release 5 and are pretty much vanilla, other than some Y2K mods (problem predates these mods), in this area. We have long been puzzled about exactly how BPCS calculates shop order operation start and end dates when backward or forward scheduling a shop order through SFC500. For the most part the dates seem to work out as expected, but there seem to be extra days "thrown in" under some, as yet undetermined circumstances. For example we have an operation with 4.0 queue days, no move days defined in the standard routing but we end up with 5 days between the operations start and end dates (inclusive) when the shop order is released. We are very suspicious of the calculations in the main scheduling engine (SFC739) and are pretty sure it has something to do with its capacity calculations. We have stepped through the scheduling engine (SFC739) - arduous task - and are very confused about something. It would seem that as the program loops from one operation to the next, regardless of work center correlation, the hours of capacity remaining from the previous operation's work center serves as the basis for the next operation's hours remaining of capacity. Maybe I am completely missing something, but to my simple mind this makes no sense at all. The previous operation's work center capacity remaining is irrelevant to the next work center's capacity. Can anyone shed some light on this for me? Each of our work centers has a variable amount of standard capacity and these remainder hour quantities leave us with partial days which are apparently rounded up to whole days. I think that is why we end up with 5 days of operation queue. At the big picture level, we really don't want a work center's capacity to impact the start and end dates of any operations on a shop order. Whether forward or backward scheduling, we want the days between operations to consistently be the sum of the queue and move days defined in the routing. We want to see we are overloaded on the capacity reports etc, but do not want the operation start and end dates to be affected. If any of this makes sense to you (miraculously!) and you have some knowledge, thoughts, or ideas related to it please get in contact with me - steveb@dayspring.com. I am not sure if this is better discussed off-line or on-line so I will leave it up to those more experienced with the etiquette of the list to make that determination. Thanks in advance, Stephen J. Bos, CIRM Operations Systems Manager DaySpring Greeting Cards steveb@dayspring.com 501.549.6562 Phone 501.524.8813 Fax +--- | This is the BPCS Users Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.