|
Ok, I'll bite ... where did you get a BPCS files poster? Since I think you're on 4.0.5, I'm assuming this is for that release? I've never heard of such an animal, but not only would it be very helpfull, but I have a new IS conference room that definitely needs some wall decorations! -----Original Message----- From: MacWheel99@aol.com <MacWheel99@aol.com> To: BPCS Users Mailing List <BPCS-L@midrange.com> Date: Saturday, April 03, 1999 1:09 AM Subject: Re: BPCS documentation >Dennis - I have a number of suggestions, based on the fact that we do use >that documentation & are not satisfied with it. > >Summary > >Ask your security officer to help you access DOC software - check out WRKOBJ >DOC* in your BPCS execution library, so you know what you might be missing if >your security is denying you access. Our security is deliberately more of a >joke in our education environment, because one of the things we are teaching >is why we need good security. > >Tell your SSA customer representative about the BPCS Files Poster that I >describe & ask if you can have one of them, then insist that it go in your >company where easily accessible by end users who NEED that information, >instead of being a pretty picture in a top manager office. > >Check out alternative BPCS documentation sources I mention at the end of this >e-mail posting. > >Ask OGS to confirm what I understood them to tell me & the practicality of >getting at the PC format that drives what arrives in BPCSDOC. > >Get the HELP for SEU & teach your end users how to access its keyword search >capability, in addition to encouraging use of helpful keys in general. > >Tell end users that you can print out the help text for any program they >wish, without anyone having to actually run the program. > >Detail Al-o-gram > >To access the "print engine" that BPCSDOC is designed for, you have to have >an SSA security officer on your deconstructing team. When first installed, >BPCSDOC seems to be invisible to the software - you have to run the document >index reorg to make the data magically appear. > >The formatting codes worked on BPCS/36 in concert with system rules for sizes >of forms, but DOC, at least at the V4 level, does not obey either its own >formatting codes, or the SYS013 user settings for favorite printer, on-hold, >etc. We do not use separator pages, we have different printers in different >facilities & departments, we use non-standard sized green bar paper, and >while BPCS has a system so end users can select where they want their output >to go, onto what kind of form, DOC is one of several areas of SSA exception >to their own rules - SFC730 is another we just found. > >If you think I am long winded, you have not read any of these documents. > >However you print them, be prepared for in excess of 100 pages per >application, although not all of the approx 75 documents are that long, in >which there is a truely massive volume of either totally blank or half blank >pages, and some documents are too large to view in SEU. When I asked SSA >Help line about some of this stuph, I learned that they now write these >documents on a PC and transport them to AS/400 objects, and something is lost >in translation, so a trick question is whether the original PC versions are >accessible to BPCS customers who only want a PC version, and what PC software >was involved, in case the same kind would be helpful to end user. > >Most of my users forget what the HELP key is for until we are walking them >through the solution to a problem & they never get into the habit of using >F1. Such individuals are not going to get any benefit out of hundreds of >pages not only poorly cross-indexed, the purpose of some of the formatting >codes is to capture sub-title heading lines to generate an index to contents >similar to Table of Contents in Word. > >At best, the BPCS documentation should be used as a reference tool on a >department by department basis. We use it when researching how BPCS intended >some codes to be used & what the significance are of fields & terminology we >stumble over. It is not practical for helping end-users - the HELP key is >1,000 times more helpful & who uses that? > >Suppose someone wants to create a query over some BPCS files - the official >documentation does not get into sufficient structural detail to be of much >help - IBM external file definition reports are needed, along with an >understanding of the application file structure & where do you get that >understanding - check out the SSA Poster used when implementing BPCS - it >charts what files are dependent on what other files & how they are >inter-related. We used to have two of them & I think we now have managed to >misplace both. The posters became manager perks, lost when ready for some >other wall decoration, not easily accessible months later by end users for >which there is an on-going serious need. > >If you are not familiar with the SSA Poster, it is a wall sized color coded >chart of files by application, showing the flow of data by application, with >well thought out icons indicating nature of files inter-relationships. For >example, when labor is reported via SFC600 or JIT600 - which files get the >scrap history, and cost updates --- when we find weird costs - show us a list >of the suspects --- what is the flow of data through shipping files, to help >us add some reports. > >During our Y2k conversion, we used colored markers to indicate like a pert >diagram, which of these files had a problem waiting on some modification or >BMR or conversion issue to be resolved, which were being re-keyed because we >were changing codes, and which were being translated by which collection of >software. > >For the BPCSDOC documents to have value, the user has to have access to SEU & >know how to use search capability to FIND where the text is that is relevant >to what they need, then just LP (think DOS inside AS/400 text editor) the few >pages on that topic, and also know which of the documents explain what those >codes on the screen mean, how to get to what you want to do navigating >through the tree of options, how the files are interrelated etc. If you are >in the wrong document for the info that you want, there is no pointer telling >you which one explains MIS under the covers, what those funny codes mean, or >what to do when something is messed up. > >For those users who do check out HELP - some of them are interested in what >some program DOES without actually executing them & for those individuals I >sometimes print out the SOURCE code for help screens of the programs of their >choice, from QPNLSRC (UIM Panels). > >Check out the alternative BPCS documentation offered by >http://www.unbeatenpathintl.com/bpcsconsulting.html >which includes both V4 and V6 - pricing on individual application areas >varies from $60.00 to $275.00 & comes with a guarantee that you will get >benefit out of this or your money back. Several key areas that we need >better documentation for does not appear to be listed on their web page. > >and >David Slicker >DS Solutions >(414) 251-6010 - phone >(414) 251-6011 - fax >dslic@aol.com > >for V6.0.02 and V6.0.04 - he offers a more comprehensive perspective for a >larger sticker price, but I would suggest that the costs of these manuals are >peanuts compared to the hassles of trying to pretty print SSA documentation >whose value is questionable for any but the most gung ho MIS person. > >and the 3rd alternative offered by George in another posting > >Al Macintyre >+--- >| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List! >| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com. >| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com. >| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. >| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com >+--- > +--- | This is the BPCS Users Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.