RE: CEA Tax Treatment -- BPCS-L

Instead of entering a reason code, I would use the macroable event 
feature of Subsystem event determination.  Otherwise, I agree 
completely.

--Paul


>From uucp@uucp1.mcs.net Tue Mar  2 04:14:07 1999
>Received: from uucphost.mcs.net (Uucp1.mcs.net [192.160.127.93]) by 
Kitten.mcs.com (8.8.7/8.8.2) with ESMTP id GAA02903; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 
06:13:59 -0600 (CST)
>Received: (from uucp@localhost)
>       by uucphost.mcs.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA28982;
>       Tue, 2 Mar 1999 06:13:58 -0600 (CST)
>Received: (from majordom@localhost)
>       by midrange.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id FAA09009
>       for bpcs-l-outgoing; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 05:46:43 -0600
>Received: (from uucp@localhost)
>       by midrange.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with UUCP id FAA08731
>       for BPCS-L@midrange.com; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 05:30:44 -0600
>Received: from ostrich.prod.itd.earthlink.net 
(ostrich.prod.itd.earthlink.net [207.217.120.14])
>       by uucphost.mcs.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA26827
>       for <BPCS-L@midrange.com>; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 05:27:00 -0600 (CST)
>Received: from goose.prod.itd.earthlink.net 
(goose.prod.itd.earthlink.net [207.217.120.18])
>       by ostrich.prod.itd.earthlink.net (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA21580
>       for <BPCS-L@midrange.com>; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 15:40:24 -0800 (PST)
>Received: from ip135.fort-wayne.in.pub-ip.psi.net 
(ip135.fort-wayne.in.pub-ip.psi.net [38.30.20.135])
>       by goose.prod.itd.earthlink.net (8.8.7/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA09722
>       for <BPCS-L@midrange.com>; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 15:40:20 -0800 (PST)
>Received: by ip135.fort-wayne.in.pub-ip.psi.net with Microsoft Mail
>       id <01BE6409.B224EC00@ip135.fort-wayne.in.pub-ip.psi.net>; Mon, 1 Mar 
1999 17:34:01 -0600
>Message-ID: <01BE6409.B224EC00@ip135.fort-wayne.in.pub-ip.psi.net>
>From: Mark Seaton <maseaton@earthlink.net>
>To: "'BPCS-L@midrange.com'" <BPCS-L@midrange.com>
>Subject: RE: CEA Tax Treatment
>Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 17:31:50 -0600
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="---- 
=_NextPart_000_01BE6409.B22E13C0"
>Sender: owner-bpcs-l@midrange.com
>Precedence: bulk
>Reply-To: BPCS-L@midrange.com
>X-List-Name: BPCS Users Mailing List (BPCS-L@midrange.com)
>
>This will work fine if you only have one line on the PO that you are =
>trying to cost, or multiple lines use the same commodity code/account =
>number.  You are right in that you could set up a separate reason code 
=
>that would get you pointed to a different model where the SDPACS07 =
>amount line uses the commodity code account number.  The user would 
then =
>need to remember to change the reason code when they wanted to process 
=
>an AP invoice where the tax amount should go to the same account as the 
=
>commodity account rather than to a generic tax account.  Again this is 
=
>only going to work if all of the lines that you are costing on that =
>invoice are to go to the same account number.
>
>Mark Seaton
>Seaton Consulting Services
>515-267-0392
>maseaton@earthlink.net
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From:  Joe Green [SMTP:joegreen@execpc.com]
>Sent:  Monday, March 01, 1999 8:28 AM
>To:    BPCS-L@midrange.com
>Subject:       Re: CEA Tax Treatment
>
>This can be done fairly simply in the ATP setup. The commodities that =
>need
>to have the tax included in the purchase rather than the tax account =
>need
>to run a different model. They can do many things to accomplish this 
but
>the idea being that the commodities drive another model versus the 
other
>types. The model will determine the account to be the same as the
>commodity. However I think there might be something quirky about this 
if =
>I
>can recall.
>
>Joe Green
>Unbeaten Path International
>www.unbeatenpathintl.com/
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Martha Bayer <mbayer@badgerminingcorp.com>
>To: BPCS Mailing List (E-mail) <BPCS-L@midrange.com>
>Date: Thursday, February 25, 1999 5:33 PM
>Subject: CEA Tax Treatment
>
>
>>
>>Badger Mining went live on 08/01/98 with BPCS version 6.0.02, Client
>Server.
>>
>>When we designed our ATP setup last year, three different SSA =
>consultants
>>agreed that the only way to handle sales taxes in the model for 
invoice
>>entry was to charge them to a separate tax account.  Now our 
accounting
>>staff has a problem.  Some taxes, like on construction projects, 
should =
>be
>>capitalized instead of expensed.  And accounting wants the taxes =
>included
>>when looking at expenses for certain types of commodities.  Any
>suggestions?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Martha Bayer
>>mbayer@badgerminingcorp.com
>>920-361-2388
>>
>>+---
>>| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
>>| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
>>| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
>>| To unsubscribe from this list send email to =
>BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
>>| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
>>+---
>>
>
>+---
>| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
>| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
>| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
>| To unsubscribe from this list send email to 
BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
>| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
>+---
>


______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---