× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: RE: CEA Tax Treatment
  • From: Mark Seaton <maseaton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 17:31:50 -0600

This will work fine if you only have one line on the PO that you are trying to 
cost, or multiple lines use the same commodity code/account number.  You are 
right in that you could set up a separate reason code that would get you 
pointed to a different model where the SDPACS07 amount line uses the commodity 
code account number.  The user would then need to remember to change the reason 
code when they wanted to process an AP invoice where the tax amount should go 
to the same account as the commodity account rather than to a generic tax 
account.  Again this is only going to work if all of the lines that you are 
costing on that invoice are to go to the same account number.

Mark Seaton
Seaton Consulting Services
515-267-0392
maseaton@earthlink.net


-----Original Message-----
From:   Joe Green [SMTP:joegreen@execpc.com]
Sent:   Monday, March 01, 1999 8:28 AM
To:     BPCS-L@midrange.com
Subject:        Re: CEA Tax Treatment

This can be done fairly simply in the ATP setup. The commodities that need
to have the tax included in the purchase rather than the tax account need
to run a different model. They can do many things to accomplish this but
the idea being that the commodities drive another model versus the other
types. The model will determine the account to be the same as the
commodity. However I think there might be something quirky about this if I
can recall.

Joe Green
Unbeaten Path International
www.unbeatenpathintl.com/

-----Original Message-----
From: Martha Bayer <mbayer@badgerminingcorp.com>
To: BPCS Mailing List (E-mail) <BPCS-L@midrange.com>
Date: Thursday, February 25, 1999 5:33 PM
Subject: CEA Tax Treatment


>
>Badger Mining went live on 08/01/98 with BPCS version 6.0.02, Client
Server.
>
>When we designed our ATP setup last year, three different SSA consultants
>agreed that the only way to handle sales taxes in the model for invoice
>entry was to charge them to a separate tax account.  Now our accounting
>staff has a problem.  Some taxes, like on construction projects, should be
>capitalized instead of expensed.  And accounting wants the taxes included
>when looking at expenses for certain types of commodities.  Any
suggestions?
>
>
>
>
>Martha Bayer
>mbayer@badgerminingcorp.com
>920-361-2388
>
>+---
>| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
>| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
>| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
>| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
>| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
>+---
>

+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---

application/ms-tnef


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.