× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: BPCS Performance Problems
  • From: "Joe Green" <joegreen@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1999 17:15:14 -0600

I agree, what ever size SSA sizes for you, you probably will outgrow it as
soon as you turn it on.  lol

I'm sure SSA is working with IBM to attempt to right size their products
together.  Unfortunately hardware does not come cheap, and if it runs slow
I'm sure their answer will be to buy a bigger box.

joegreen@execpc.com
Unbeaten Path International
http://www.unbeatenpathintl.com/

-----Original Message-----
From: mitchell@nexgensoftware.com <mitchell@nexgensoftware.com>
To: BPCS-L@midrange.com <BPCS-L@midrange.com>
Date: Tuesday, February 16, 1999 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: BPCS Performance Problems


>
>
>
>Dwight,
>
>You wrote:
>
>|We are interested if anyone else has had the problem of receiving an
AS/400
>|mode with about 250 users spread across 6 sites.  The CFINTxx jobs will
>|consume upwards of 80% of the total CPU available and bring response times
>|up to the 7 minute range.  The AS/400 we were sized at originally is an
S20
>|model 2177 with 1GB of ram.  We are now being told be SSA that we need an
>|S20 model 2178 with 2.5 GB of ram.  Needless to say management is not
>|pleased about the additional $100,000 outlay of cash.  I am concerned
about
>|the new estimate (fool me once shame on you... fool me twice shame on me).
>|Your feedback is welcome.
>|
>|Regards,
>|
>|Dwight Slessman
>|National Electrical Carbon Products, Inc.
>
>Are you serious that SSA has sized you for a "server" AS/400 when you are
>running mixed-mode V6.X???
>
>Mixed-mode BPCS places its workload in the interactive subsystem.  The
server
>series AS/400s are designed NOT to run optimally (the 400 actually,
purposely
>de-tunes itself -- thus your CFINT jobs) with high interactive workloads.
>
>With 250 users, I can't see how anyone would have recommended an
S-anything.
>Although I am not advising you on the proper size machine for your purpose,
you
>will most likely need an interactive box such as a Model 620, 640.  And
yes,
>this will cost you dearly.
>
>Please feel free to call me if you want more details on this
>
>Best of Luck,
>
>Daniel J. Mitchell
>Nexgen
>+1 630 300 6040
>
>
>+---
>| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
>| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
>| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
>| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
>| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
>+---
>

+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.