Re: BPCS 6.02plf Mixed Mode

[Michael Ozanne <mozanne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

In message <s5a9eed2.017@hsc-ss.com>, Jeff Hedquist <Hedquist@hsc-
ss.com> writes
>We have found it necessary to abandon BPCS 6.02plf Full Client/Server (in a 
>hurry). We are in the process right now of loading BPCS 6.02plf Mixed Mode 
>(March CUM).
>
>Does anyone know of any serious problems with this release that we should be 
>aware of before we continue with our education and prototyping sessions?

Labour ticket backflushing was missing up until the Nov 97 cum. I don't
know if it was working after that. Your accountants will probably regard
CEA security as inadequate. And costing did not properly allow for
process yield factors. There was also a bug wrt to G/L reason codes on
customer order headers. i.e default glrc's were not picked up. DRP
failed to plan the first target facility selected.

-- 
Michael Ozanne (Also ozannem@pacific.co.uk)
+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---