Re: BPCS 6.02plf Mixed Mode -- BPCS-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

In message <0023qucuskmw.0024oqwukqiy@eaton.com>,
MichaelBruxmeier@eaton.com writes
>Best should be to get 6.004 cum April or later MM. We had tremendous problems 
>with 6.002plf MM which conluded in stopping the project until 6.004 was 
>available. 

6.0.04 is less stable than 6.0.02 PLF. Missing literals, planning
failures, corruption problems between CIC and IIM, ECM is less complete. 


-- 
Michael Ozanne (Also ozannem@pacific.co.uk)
+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.