× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Michael,

I use search in WDSc frequently and have never had a problem so I can't give you any suggestions regarding settings or such.

I will say that what I like about WDSc's search vs PDM's is the ability to perform one massive search over multiple source files in multiple libraries with one invocation and, then, to go right to the member for viewing or editing.

Jerry C. Adams
IBM System i Programmer/Analyst
--
B&W Wholesale
office: 615-995-7024
email: jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


-----Original Message-----
From: wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Koester, Michael
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 9:11 AM
To: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] WDSCi shop moving to IBM i 6.1

Thanks for that, Dave. The one feature I still fall back to PDM for is
string-search through our source members. I've not found anything
acceptable in WDSC here - it just dies trying. I suspect that has been
resolved in RDi/RDP? If indeed that is no longer an issue, I could do
w/o ADTS.



Prior to my original post, I reviewed the discussion on the archives
from last August (Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] justifying RDi when WDSCi
'still works'), and wondered if the sentiments have changed, or if new
justifications for upgrade have become obvious.



-- Michael

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



WDSCi 7.0 runs against 6.1 just as well as it runs against V5R4. I
haven't used any of the 6.1 compiler enhancements, so I'm not quite sure
what to expect there. I know it won't prompt them, just not sure what
the verifiers and syntax checkers will make of them.



I don't know how your ADTS entitlements compare to your actual
requirements, but that's also something your management needs to look
at. Maybe if you have extra ADTS licenses, you can reduce your RDP
costs through the upgrade option, if that's available to you. I tried
to work that angle, but it didn't pan out here.



Dave Shaw

Mohawk Industries





----- Original Message -----

From: "Koester, Michael" <mkoester@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

To: <WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 8:32 AM

Subject: [WDSCI-L] WDSCi shop moving to IBM i 6.1





Word from system admin is that we will soon be on i 6.1. I am using

WDSC V 7.0.0.8 (7.0.0.20090225_1508) and I have concerns that our WDSC

development environment may soon need to go RDi/RDP. I understand
that

WDSC does not "grow" with post-v5r4 advances to RPG.



First question: How successful is running WDSC in the IBM i 6.1

environment?




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.