Re: RDi and Linux -- WDSCI-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: RDi and Linux
From: Buck <kc2hiz@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 12:32:10 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l>
List-help: <mailto:wdsci-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries <wdsci-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:wdsci-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l>, <mailto:wdsci-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l>, <mailto:wdsci-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Joe Pluta wrote:

Buck wrote:

Right. There is exactly zero chance that our web guys will throw out everything they've done in .NET and switch over to EGL. Zero.
I'm going to hop out of this thread right about now. There are shops where RDi and RDI-SOA don't make sense. I can't help that, but that's not an argument against either product.

No, absolutely. I'm not arguing against RDi -- I use WDSC now and really like it. Just thought I'd explain my '1' (no interest in a Linux port) vote.
--buck

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: RDi and Linux , Joe Pluta

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.