RE: Removing a plug-in

>><snip> a popular open source product means that development cycle is 
>>shorter, <endsnip>

>Providing someone contributes to the project.

IBM's choice to put WDSCi on top of an open source product introduces the
same question that keep companies from going with other open-source
products: who's going to support it? As long as IBM feels free to not work
on Eclipse problems, and Eclipse has no obligation to WDSCi users, then
there's a crack in the support infrastructure. Uninstalling plug-ins is not
a mission critical issue. I'm just saying it reflects a less than perfect
support situation.

Kelly  



-----Original Message-----
From: wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of rob@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 10:01 AM
To: Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries
Subject: RE: [WDSCI-L] Removing a plug-in


<snip> a popular open source product means that development cycle is 
shorter, <endsnip>

Providing someone contributes to the project.

Rob Berendt
-- 
Group Dekko Services, LLC
Dept 01.073
PO Box 2000
Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com

_______________________________________________
This is the Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries  (WDSCI-L)
mailing list
To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.