× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



On 01-Jul-2015 20:25 -0600, Vernon Hamberg wrote:
On 7/1/2015 6:54 PM, Rich Marion wrote:
This is the main reason why I try to avoid MONITOR. It confused
other programmers where I work when they read through job logs.

There's a nice method for removing distracting messages - it
involves sending a message before whatever process you want to clean
up in, get a msg key from that one, then do another at the end - then
loop through the possible message keys (4-byte integer, basically) -
IBM has knowledge base article on it, I don't have the link right
now.

Vendors should be using this kind of technique to clean up their
logs - far too easy just to leave junk lying around!!


That methodology is for intended for messages sent to programs that are no longer on the stack.

The monitored messages will have been sent to the active program; naturally, that program is still on the stack :-) so either call the /remove message/ API for expected\handled message(s) to remove them or call the /move message/ API to bubble\percolate the messages up the stack.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.