RE: external subprocedures setting on LR: performance impact?

Dan wrote:

>Since QA testing is a significant undertaking in this 
>shop, anytime we can plug in discrete modules into a 
>new application, or modify one module in an application 
>that uses several modules, makes for easier and faster
>testing.  Does that adequately answer your "foot in mouth" 
>argument, Buck? <g>  

No, my foot might still be firmly lodged.  My point is that my view of
procedures is that they are small: tiny, even.  A proc fits on one
page/display.  They're easy to understand at a glance.  Programs are more
complex, they are built up from my procedure-BIFs, and take time to
comprehend.

You can substitute the word 'program' or 'procedure' for your use of the
word 'module' above and have the same effect.  In fact, programs may be a
better fit for you if you are using bind by copy instead of service
programs, but that borders on a lecture, I guess.
  --buck