More on Call or Bound Call

[Buzz Fenner <bfenner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I originally wrote:

>Hi all,

>I'm slowly teaching myself ILE RPG (yikes!), rather RPG IV (apology to 
B.C.).  The following code is a >simple call to the command parser.  Here's 
the old code and the new code:

>0353.00      C           *IN06     IFEQ '1'
>0354.00      C                     CALL 'QCAEXEC'
>0355.00      C                     PARM 'DSPMSG'  CMD     6
>0356.00      C                     PARM 6         LENGTH 155
>0357.00      C                     ELSE
>
>
>0059.00 D*
>0060.00 DRunCmd           pr                  extpgm('QCMDEXC')
>0061.00 D command                       80a   const
>0062.00 D length                        15p 5 const
>0063.00 D*
>
>bunch of code, etc.
>
>0231.00 C*
>0232.00 C     *in06         ifeq      *on
>0233.00 C                   callp     RunCmd('DSPMSG':6)
>0234.00 C                   else
>
>From a technical viewpoint, are these two chuncks of code equivalent?  Or, 
is the RPG IV code a >bound call of some sort?  The discussion in the 
reference manual leads me to believe that the RPG IV >code represents a 
dynamic call to QCAEXEC.  Plus, if they are equivalent, what is the 
advantage of >the RPG IV code (if any)?

I appreciate all of the feedback from Joel, Jon, Scott, Joep, and David 
(hope I didn't forget anyone).  I have two goals in putting these types of 
posts on the discussion group.  One, as you may guess from the subject 
matter of my original post, is to gather useful information pertaining to 
performance advantages of RPG IV over RPG III.  Second, will be to find 
opcodes, bif's, etc., that provide added functionality over what my shop 
has now using RPG III.  However, I have to sell my boss on making a move 
towards RPG IV, and he will be a hard sell coming from the "If it ain't 
broke...," point of view.  Plus, I'm in a Catch 22 situation: How do I 
learn without writing new code vs. the mind set of not changing the status 
quo.  (I realize I'm flogging a dead horse here, and I'm getting away from 
the subject at hand).  So, I'm gathering ammunition and hopefully will 
choose my battles wisely.

Also, I take no offense with any criticism of my syntax.  After all, if 
other people (with you guys being the experts) don't see what you do, it 
never gets critiqued!

Buzz Fenner
bfennerNS@jonesborocwl.org
Remove NS to reply


+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---