× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Dave McKenzie wrote:
According to this:

http://www.overclockers.com/tips30/

power (and therefore heat) increases linearly with frequency, and with
the square of the voltage.

So a CPU operating at 150% of rated speed (but same voltage) produces
1.5 times as much heat.

A CPU operating at 150% of rated voltage (if that's possible) produces
2.25 times as much heat.
Please note that's heat generated, which doesn't translate directly to chip temperature. That depends entirely on your cooling system, and a stock cooling system can handle a lot of heat. If you'll note, your article is talking about temperatures in the range of 50-75 degrees *centigrade*, which is 120-170 degrees.

My CPU fully loaded is running at 26C (about 78F), which is the *lowest* temperature in that whole article.

He makes a good point though: "It should be your objective, overclocking or not, to run your systems at the lowest possible temperature." And that I heartily concur with. The lowest possible temperature, of course, being a business decision, not an absolute one <smile>.

Joe

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.