× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Here is an IBM page that discusses the read-only attribute.

https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/i/7.5?topic=security-root-qopensys-user-defined-
file-systems

It also lists how the UNIX permissions (*R,*W,*X) map to IBM authorities.

So whether you set the permission using the UNIX chmod using bits or the IBM
CHGAUT command using *R,*W,*X it makes no difference to the authority
checking process.

There is one situation where the UNIX "ls" command will display information
not available using the native DSPAUT command and that is Primary Group
Authority. UNIX lets you set the Primary Group Permission even when there
is no Primary Group assigned to the object.

Hidden Group Permission example.

Assign the owner and group *RW permissions.

chmod 660 /home/testuser/.ssh/authorized_keys

list the permissions using the UNIX LS command. (it shows the group
permissions)

ls -la /home/testuser/.ssh/authorized_keys
-rw-rw---- 1 testuser 0 835 Apr 2 13:11 /home/testuser/.ssh/authorized_keys

Then check the permissions with the DSPAUT command. (group permissions are
not shown)

dspaut '/home/testuser/.ssh/authorized_keys'

Object . . . . . . . . . . . . : /home/testuser/.ssh/authorized_keys
Type . . . . . . . . . . . . . : STMF
Owner . . . . . . . . . . . . : TESTUSER
Primary group . . . . . . . . : *NONE

Data --Object Authorities--
Opt User Authority Exist Mgt Alter Ref
*PUBLIC *EXCLUDE
TESTUSER *RW X X X X

So, the UNIX ls command shows the group profile has permissions to the
authorized_keys file even though the native DSPAUT command says there is no
Group assigned the STMF.

You can remove the hidden group permissions with the following command.

CHGPGP OBJ('/home/testuser/.ssh/authorized_keys') NEWPGP(*NONE)
DTAAUT(*NONE) OBJAUT(*NONE)


Having group authorities assigned to IFS object where no group profile is
assigned can cause problems.

One example is with SSH and the authorized_keys file.

Assume there is "no Group Profile assigned" to the authorized_keys file but
you issue a chmod 660 to the authorized_keys. Then you try to connect using
ssh. It will fail.

You will see the following message in syslog.

Authentication refused: bad ownership or modes for file
/home/testuser/.ssh/authorized_keys

Issue a chmod 600 authorized_keys and the ssh connection works.

I have seen this group profile/permission issue cause problems on jobs other
than ssh although it is rare.




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.